I really don’t understand the people who keep yelling that security awareness is no good. Here’s the latest rant.
The argument is always the same: security awareness is not 100% foolproof protection against all possible attacks, so you shouldn’t (it is morally wrong to?) even try to teach security awareness in your company.
This guys works for a security consultancy. He says that instead of teaching awareness, you should concentrate on audit, monitoring, protecting critical data, segmenting the network, access creep, incident response, and strong security leadership. (If we looked into their catalogue of seminars, I wonder what we would find them selling?)
Security awareness training isn’t guaranteed to be 100% effective protection. Neither is AV, audit, monitoring, incident response, etc. You still use those thing even though they don’t guarantee 100% protection. You should at least try (seriously) to teach security awareness. Maybe more than just a single 4 hour session. (It’s called “defence in depth.”)
Tell you what: I’ll teach security awareness in my company, and you try a social engineering attack. You may hit some of my people: people aren’t perfect. But I’ll bet that at least some of my people will detect and report your social engineering attack. And your data isolation won’t.