Nightmare on Malware Street
The Scientific American, no less, has published an article on malware. Not that they don’t have every right, it’s just that the article is short on fact or help, and long on rather wild conjecture.
The author does have some points to make, even if he makes them very, very badly.
We, both as security professionals and as a society, don’t take malware seriously enough. The security literature on the subject is appalling. It is hard to find books on malware, even harder to find good ones, and well nigh impossible to find decent information in general security books. The problem has been steadily growing since it was a vague academic topic, and has been ignored for so long that, now that it is a real problem, even most security experts have only a tenuous grasp of it.
Almost all reports do sound like paranoid thrillers. Promoting the idea of shadowy genius figures in dark corners manipulating us at will, this engenders a kind of overall depression: we can’t possibly fight it, so we might was well not even try. This attitude is further exacerbated but the dearth of information: we can’t even know what’s going on, so how can we even try to fight it?
It is getting more and more difficult to find malware, mostly because we are constantly creating new places for it to hide. In the name of “user friendliness,” we are building ever more complex systems, with ever more crevices for the pumas to hide in.
Yes, then he goes off into wild speculation and gets all “Reflections on Trusting Trust” on us. Which kind of loses the valid points.