A Fairy Tale
Withdrawn on legal advice. Sigh…
So I’m going to ask some hypothetical questions instead.
Principle 3 of the AMTSO (Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization) guidelines document (http://www.amtso.org/amtso—download—amtso-fundamental-principles-of-testing.html) states that “Testing should be reasonably open and transparent.”
The document goes on to explain what information on the test and the test methodology it’s reasonable to ask for.
So is it open and transparent for an anti-malware tester who claims that his tests are compliant with AMTSO guidelines to decline to answer a vendor’s questions or give any information about the reported performance of their product unless they buy a copy of the report or pay a consultancy fee to the tester?
There is, of course, nothing to stop an anti-malware tester soliciting payment from the vendors whose products have been tested both in advance of the test and in response to requests for further information. But is he then entitled to claim to be independent and working without vendor funding? In what respect is this substantially different to the way in which certification testing organizations work, for example?
It seems to me that AMTSO is going to have to consider those questions at its next meeting (in Prague, next week). Purely hypothetically, of course. What do you think?
David Harley CISSP FBCS CITP
Small Blue-Green World